Arkansas Valley Conduit

Overview

The Arkansas Valley Conduit (AVC) is a major infrastructure project that upon completion will convey a reliable municipal and industrial water supply from Pueblo Reservoir to 40 communities serving a projected future population of 50,000 in Southeastern Colorado via pipelines. The area includes water providers in Bent, Crowley, Kiowa, Otero, Prowers, and Pueblo counties.

These areas are dependent on groundwater supplies that are in many cases contaminated by naturally occurring radionuclides such as radium and uranium, or by direct influence of surface water that contains harmful microorganisms and pollutants. These communities increasingly face expensive alternative remedies such as reverse-osmosis, ion exchange, filtration, and bottled water. A reliable source of clean, safe water is needed for the area’s health and welfare.

The AVC is designed to provide a long-term sustainable water supply to these communities through initial treatment and conveyance by the Pueblo Board of Water Works to the beginning of the AVC near Pueblo Memorial Airport. When completed, the AVC will supply as much as 7,500 acre-feet annually to these communities.

The Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Act, signed in 1962 by President John F. Kennedy, authorized construction of the AVC, but it was never constructed because the communities could not afford 100 percent of the costs. Public Law 111-11, signed by President Barack Obama in 2009, provided 65 percent federal funding for the Arkansas Valley Conduit. A preferred alternative was identified in 2014.

The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation worked with Project sponsors (the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District) to reduce costs, the need for federal appropriations, and the time needed to construct the AVC.

Congress provided a $28 million appropriation in 2020 to move the Project into construction.

General

  • The AVC will provide a reliable long-term municipal and industrial water supply to communities east of Pueblo along the Arkansas River in southeastern Colorado.
  • These communities rely on groundwater supplies that in many cases are contaminated with naturally occurring radionuclides, selenium, salts, nitrates and other harmful materials.
  • The AVC was authorized in the 1962 Fryingpan-Arkansas Project Act as a way to bring clean drinking water to communities east of Pueblo.
  • The AVC, when completed, will deliver as much as 7,500 acre-feet of water annually through 260 miles of pipeline from Pueblo to Lamar and Eads. Water will flow by gravity, except for one pumping station to bring water to Eads.
  • The AVC will serve an estimated future population of 50,000.
  • Cost of the AVC is estimated to be between $564 million and $610 million (2019 dollars). Funding will be through federal appropriations, federal loans and grants, state loans and grants, and miscellaneous revenues from the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project.
  • 35 percent of total Project costs will be repaid by local Project beneficiaries over a period of up to 50 years.
  • The first construction contract is expected to be awarded in 2022, following necessary planning, environmental, and land-use activities.

History

The Arkansas Valley Conduit (AVC) has a long history dating back more than six decades.

Cities and chambers of commerce in Southeastern Colorado began talking about a pipeline project in the 1950s as a way to deal with a chronically poor water supply in the Lower Arkansas Valley. The Arkansas River had been heavily appropriated for irrigated agriculture, and ground water was brackish. The Water Development Association of Southern Colorado sold golden frying pans up and down the valley to promote the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project, which held the promise of bringing a supplemental supply of water for both irrigation and domestic use.

The Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District was formed in Pueblo District Court in 1958 as the local sponsor of the Fry-Ark Project. The District includes parts of nine counties, including the six which are part of the AVC.

The AVC was authorized in the original Fry-Ark Project legislation in 1962 (Public Law 87-590). The AVC would not increase Fry-Ark Project water diversions from the western slope of Colorado; rather, it was intended to improve drinking water quality.

The AVC was not constructed with the original Fry-Ark Project primarily because of the beneficiaries’ inability to repay 100 percent of construction costs as identified to be required in the Public Law 87-590. In 2009, Congress amended the original Fry-Ark Project legislation in Public Law 111-11, which authorized annual federal funding, as necessary, for constructing the AVC, and provided that 35 percent of total Project construction costs would be repaid by local Project beneficiaries over a period of no more than 50 years.

The Bureau of Reclamation’s Technical Service Center (TSC) in Denver compared five pipeline alignments in 2012 for construction of the AVC. A supplemental report was issued in June 2013 for one additional alterative, for a total of six alternatives. A Final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) was issued in August 2013. Seven alternatives (six action alternatives from the Appraisal Design Report plus no action) were analyzed under the Final EIS. A Record of Decision (ROD) was signed by Reclamation’s Great Plains (now known as Missouri Basin) Regional Director in February 2014 which selected the “Comanche North Alterative” for implementation.

This alternative then became known as the “Preferred Alternative”. The TSC issued a Feasibility Design Report for the Preferred Alternative in September 2016 and a Project Cost Summary Report in October 2017. Total estimated cost to construct the preferred alternative was $640 million in 2016 dollars (approximately $700 million in 2019 dollars).

Through a collaborative effort between Reclamation and the Southeastern Colorado Water Conservancy District in 2018 and 2019, a revised Project configuration was developed with the goal of reducing the Project costs and requirements for Reclamation appropriations. Project estimated costs were reduced to a range of $564 to $610 million, and through alternative funding sources, the estimated requirement for additional Reclamation appropriations was reduced to a range of $355 to $414 million.

Map

AVC Map

Active Participants

Bent County
  • Hasty Water Company
  • Las Animas
  • McClave Water Association
Crowley County
  • 96 Pipeline Company
  • Crowley County Water Association
  • Crowley
  • Olney Springs
  • Ordway
  • Sugar City
Kiowa County
  • Eads
Otero County
  • Beehive Water Assn.
  • Bents Fort Water Co.
  • Town of Cheraw
  • East End Water Assn.
  • Eureka Water Co.
  • Fayette Water Assn.
  • Fowler
  • Hancock Inc.
  • Hilltop Water Co.
  • Holbrook Center Soft Water
  • Homestead Improvement
  • La Junta
  • Manzanola
  • Newdale-Grand Valley North Holbrook Water
  • Patterson Valley
  • Riverside Water Co.
  • Rocky Ford
  • South Side Water Assn.
  • South Swink Water Co.
  • Swink
  • Valley Water Co.
  • Vroman
  • West Grand Valley Water
  • West Holbrook Water
Prowers County
  • Lamar
  • May Valley Water Assn.
  • Wiley
Pueblo County
  • Avondale
  • Boone

Project Timeline

  • April 2, 2020 – Project Charter signed
  • April 17, 2020 – PMP signed
  • May 20, 2020 – Boone Reach 30 percent Design Package Delivery
  • Oct. 3, 2020 – Groundbreaking Ceremony held in Pueblo, Colorado

Point of Contact

Sam Braverman

Chief, Engineering Services Branch

Bureau of Reclamation, Eastern Colorado Area Office

11056 W County Rd 18E, Loveland, CO 80537

(970) 461-5305

sbraverman@usbr.gov

Last Updated: 6/14/21