The Paradox Valley Unit (PVU) was constructed to assist in meeting the objectives and standards of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1948 (P.L. 80-845) and the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act of 1974, as amended and supplemented (P.L. 93-320). The Salinity Control Act authorizes the construction, operations, and maintenance of works in the Colorado River Basin to control the salinity of water delivered to users in the United States and the Republic of Mexico.
The PVU is located along the Dolores River in western Montrose County, approximately 50 miles southwest of Grand Junction, Colorado, and 10 miles east of the Colorado-Utah border. The PVU extracts naturally-occurring brine groundwater in the Paradox Valley, thereby preventing it from entering the Dolores River. Saline concentrations of this natural brine groundwater have been measured in excess of 250,000 milligrams per liter, which, prior to the PVU, added more than 205,000 tons of salt to the Dolores River annually. The Dolores River is a major tributary to the Colorado River. The PVU is designed to prevent the natural salt load from degrading the water quality of the main stem of the Colorado River.
The PVU consists of facilities to intercept shallow brine and inject it into the Leadville geologic formation via a Class V deep injection well. The PVU has been injecting brine since 1996. Approximately 100,000 tons of salt are injected annually; this correlates to about ten percent of the total salinity control in the Colorado River, making the PVU one of the most effective salinity control projects in the Colorado River Basin.
Environmental Impact Statement
The existing brine injection well may be nearing the end of its useful life, so the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is investigating alternatives for intercepting the brine in order to enhance and protect the quality of water available in the Colorado River for use in the United States and the Republic of Mexico. Reclamation intends to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to identify and evaluate brine disposal alternatives to replace or supplement the existing brine injection well.
Reclamation published a Notice of Intent (NOI) in the Federal Register on September 10, 2012. The NOI announced Reclamation’s intent to prepare an EIS, and initiated the scoping process which will guide the development of the EIS. Formal scoping activities for the EIS extended from September through November 2012.
Based on internal and external scoping, Reclamation’s interdisciplinary team has identified the following alternatives that will be analyzed in the EIS:
- No Action (future without well and salinity control)
- Additional Injection Well
- Evaporation Ponds
- Brine Crystallization
A draft EIS and a final EIS will be prepared to provide decision makers appropriate information and to inform the public of the proposed action, reasonable alternatives, and the impacts of the alternatives. In addition to scoping of significant issues and alternatives, key activities include analysis of alternatives that support the purpose and need, evaluation of applicable issues, and selection of a preferred alternative. The final decision will be documented in a Record of Decision (ROD) following the final EIS. The ROD will officially present the Department of the Interior’s decision on brine disposal at the PVU.
Questions and comments can be submitted to: firstname.lastname@example.org
For more information please contact:
|Lesley McWhirter, Chief||Andy Nicholas, Facility Operations Specialist|
|Environmental and Planning Group||Paradox Valley Field Office|
|Bureau of Reclamation||Bureau of Reclamation|
|Western Colorado Area Office||P.O. Box 20|
|445 West Gunnison Avenue, Suite 221||Bedrock, CO 81411|
|Grand Junction, CO 81501-5711||(970) 859-7214 or email@example.com|
|(970) 248-248-0608 or firstname.lastname@example.org|
Environmental Impact Statement Documents
- Supplement to January 2013 Scoping Report Paradox Valley Unit EIS - December 2016 | PDF
- Peer Review and Information Quality Plan for the Paradox Valley Unit Alternatives Study Environmental Impact Statement - July 2016 | PDF
- Paradox Valley Unit EIS Scoping Report - January 2013| PDF
- Paradox Valley Unit Scoping Presentation - Presented in 2012 Scoping Meetings | PDF
- News Release - September 2012 | LINK
- Federal Register Notice of Intent - September 2012| LINK
- Final Scoping Report – Paradox Evaporation Pond Pilot Study - April 2012 | PDF
Environmental Impact Statement Related Documents
- Paradox Valley Unit Brine Crystallization Technology Assessment - September 2016 | PDF
- Technical Studies and Evaluations for the Second Injection Well Alternative at the Paradox Valley Unit - September 2017 | PDF
- Air Quality Technical Report Salinity Control Investigations Paradox Valley Unit Final Report - March 2017 | PDF
- Paradox Valley Unit Salinity Control Investigations Study 1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Management 50% Design Final Report - March 2017 | PDF
- Pond Design Strategy Final Report - Pond Optimization Study 2 - February 2017 | PDF
- Feasibility and Cost Analysis Findings and Recommendation Report Paradox Valley Unit Byproducts Disposal Study - January 2017 | PDF
- Pond Operational Strategy Final Report - Pond Optimization Study 2 - January 2017 | PDF
- Paradox Valley Unit Salinity Control Investigations Study 1 - Hydrogen Sulfide Management Bedrock, CO, Treatment Options Bench Testing Final Report - November 2016 | PDF
- Site Selection Report Pond Optimization Study 2 for Paradox Valley Unit Evaporation Ponds - August 2016 | PDF
- Predictive Ecological Risk Assessment Proposed Solar Evaporation Pond System - Paradox Valley Unit - August 2016 | PDF
- Evidence for Far-Field Reservoir Pressurization: Report and Injection Data | ZIP
- Memo – Paradox Valley Unit Second Well Site Investigation Consultant Review Board - February 2014 | PDF
- Assessment of a Potential Second Injection Well Site – Paradox Valley Unit Saline Water Disposal Project - April 2013 | PDF
- Review of Geologic Investigations and Injection Well Site Selection, Paradox Valley Unit - November 2012 | PDF