Bureau of Reclamation Banner
This information is intended to convey the underlying concepts for Reclamation's decision processes. It is not mandatory.
See the Reclamation Manual for official Reclamation-wide requirements.

Reclamation's Decision Process Guide

 

go through pageWhat / How / Go On


pretty border

navigate in the page--What Is It Good For?

This can be done for internal, administrative decisions as well as external processes.

This table helps you keep track of which participants are where in the process of solving the problem. This helps focus your efforts by showing where resources can be most effectively used. By identifying which groups are at what level of awareness, you can determine what steps are needed tohelp people toward responsible judgement. If you have a group that is at responsible judgment and one unaware of the problem, then spend your resources communicating with the unaware group rather than preaching to the choir. A large number of unaware publics might signal the need for more active information dissemination.

Implementing a solution is nearly impossible without using the publics' insights and ideas, addressing their concerns, and seeking as much consenst as possible. To chart public involvement activities and progress, sometimes it is useful to take the pulse of the public at key times to determine where they are and what actions need to be taken to get to the next step.


pretty border

navigate in the page--How Do I Use It?

  1. Identify groups you want to track.
  2. Discuss issues to determine how these groups view the problem.
  3. Develop questions or thresholds that would show their level of awareness and participation.
  4. Interview key representatives of those groups or survey the groups.
  5. Use a table like the following to record the groups and the percentages of each group to assess what level they are operating under.

Issue

Levels of awareness

Group 1

Group 2

Unaware of issue



Dawning awareness



Sense of urgency



Discovery of choices



Wishful thinking



Practical resolve



Responsible judgement



Implementing decision



Sample Table

Water supplies for Marble Springs through 2050

Levels of awareness

Rachel Cole School Board

White Owl Lawn Club

Crystal River Water Board

Unaware of issue

50%

10%


Dawning awareness

40%

10%


Sense of urgency

10%

60%


Discovery of choices


20%


Wishful thinking



30%

Practical resolve



50%

Responsible judgement



20%

Implementing decision



If someone has a low level of interest or awareness, explain the problem in terms of how they or their community will be affected. Grouping approval of alternatives by publics can also be a useful tool to gauge the acceptability of an alternative or to pinpoint ways to change the alternative. This helps gauge the commitment to the alternatives.

Levels of awareness

Group

Noninterested publics


Noninterested publics (25%)


Publics which prefer the alternative


Neutral/indifferent


Publics which reject the alternative


The Stonefield Learning Group uses a quick survey to determine a group's level of commitment, understanding, and/or attitude toward an idea, proposal, plan, etc. Whenever a medium-to-large group of people want to see what the group's attitude or level of commitment is:

     
  1. Determine what is to be measured.
  2. Distribute post-its.
  3. Agree whether or not the answers are to be kept confidential.
  4. On a flipchart--draw a scale from 0 to 100, in increments of 10 (0, 10, 20, etc.)
  5. Each person writes (on a post-it) where they are on the scale, relative to the specific topic.
  6. Post-its are collected by the facilitator.
  7. Facilitator places the post-its on the scale (flipchart).
  8. Group discusses outcome of process.


pretty border

navigate in the page--Go On

GeneralToolbox

PreviousTool Selection Worksheet

NextTool List

Please contact Deena Larsen 303-445-2584 with questions or comments on this material.