Reclamation's Decision Process Guide
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
As this tool quickly shows the bottom line, it works especially well for briefings to decisionmakers or publics. If you have a go/no go decision, use a pro/con table to briefly demonstrate your rationale. Many of the analyses and discussions of proposed alternatives or options dance around a central question: will the pros outweigh the cons? The simplicity of the table is deceptive; it is one of the best ways to think through a difficult issue. A pro/con table can show both sides quickly so you can better see the entire picture. This is also a quick way to evaluate and select alternatives.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Start by brainstorming by using this table or use the results from other analyses and techniques. Write down a pro or con and its analogous con or pro. For example, if lining a canal will reduce seepage (pro) then it may also reduce groundwater recharge from seepage (con). For example, here is a simple pro/con table for recharging treated water:
To compare the pros and cons of more than one option, you can create a more complex table:
For decisions involving more than two choices, you can create a pro/con table with weights. MATS is a very effective way to do this in more detail.
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||