Reclamation's Decision Process Guide
Decision Analysis |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Decision processes are complex and messy--but necessary to get to a balanced, workable solution. To manage the process, decision analysts and facilitators organize information as it comes in. This helps to:
Document rationales for analytical methods, evaluation factors, and decisions |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
An experienced facilitator can guide the group through a process to determine what needs to be done and what will be necessary to complete the process. The group then becomes a unit working together to solve the problem--rather than an aggregate of individuals without focus. The decison process provides a framework to organize the input. Steps in the process serve as categories for information (Use whiteboards, flip charts, or the decision process worksheets to keep track). To become familiar with the steps, go through the process yourself first--as a team member or on an individual decision. This will help show what goes where. (Note that the number of steps is not sacred--some books say 4 steps, others 8, and still others 12. Just follow a logical, well thought out approach.) |
|
|||
| Using a Framework |
|
Decision processes are simultaneous--rather than lock-step with discrete, separate phases. When you learned to drive, you learned about each step separately--but many steps are applied simultaneously, and all flow together into one smooth motion. Likewise, information for many different steps comes in simultaneously, and it may become confusing. Using the steps as a framework to show what information goes where allows the group to see immediately that there are gaps which need to be filled in before implementation. While decision analysis is a constant process, bringing it out in the open at critical junctures can avoid conflicts and keep participants on track:
|
|
|||
| Going in Circles |
|
The decision process is not a linear, neat package. In fact, it isn't even one process. Rather as in driving, one process to identify and handle problems or changes starts while in the midst of another. Smaller processes determine one aspect of analyzing data, documenting and communicating effectively, or refining a component, while larger processes cover the overall solution. Further, the process does not go directly from point A to point B. At times, it seems as though you have skidded back to a "previous step." Actually, you are repeating an action but with a broader, clearer understanding of issues and participants. New players (interest groups, core team members, politicians, and others) enter the process at various points; new data lead to different evaluations Think of the process as a spiral as you revisit these steps at a more comprehensive, "higher" level. |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Dragon
Tour |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
Handyman's
Tour |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|||