Reclamation's Decision Process Guide
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
External players help:
The core team can also help identify other experts that may be needed and will help coordinate interdisciplinary activities. |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Work through the network of
participants already identified and involved to broaden
your base of contacts--they will know what community participants,
political leaders, potential partners,
and technical experts need to be contacted. |
||||||||
| Identify the Players
|
Think about key players and opinion makers in the following groups:
|
|||||||
| Assemble a Core Team
|
The core team consists of technical experts and decisionmakers. You may have people from cooperating agencies and partners on the team. This team will do most of the analysis and evaluation. The core team will probably change as the process evolves. To make an initial cut, talk with many experts who can help determine what analyses and skills will be needed. Based on this, estimate the level of participation for various groups and times. |
|||||||
| Consider and define the interrelationships of staffs
involved--particularly if they are coming from different sources
(e.g., partners, Area Offices, Technical
Service Center, Washington, and contractors). Meeting with counterparts
in different agencies would be very helpful. |
||||||||
| Get Input |
At times, participants don't understand the value or
place of other contributions. Sometimes, they consider their
own area exclusively. It is important to show everyone the larger
picture so that participants can interact with others and contribute
to the whole effort. |
|||||||
| Include Mandated Participants |
Some publics have a mandate to be involved (e.g., if
Indian Trust Assets might be involved, contact the affected
Native Americans; if endangered species might be involved, contact
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service or National Marine Fisheries
Service). |
|||||||
| Cross-Fertilize |
If participants can get beyond their narrow
expertise, they can offer a great deal to others. For example,
a fisheries biologist can offer insightful ideas on hydrologic
models from a different perspective. |
|||||||
| Begin Interacting with Participants
|
Methods of interaction vary. Holding meetings, conference calls, setting up electronic bulletin boards are only a few of the possible methods at this introductory stage. Get back with participants on a regular basis--ask how they want to interact with the process (e.g., How much information do they want to receive, when, and in what format? How do they want to be involved?). Communicating informally will
help set reasonable expectations now. |
|||||||
| Identify the Decisionmakers |
Make a broad, preparatory determination of what decisions will be needed and at what stage of the process. Then meet with the participants to hammer out which decisions will be made when, how they'll be made, and which decisionmakers will have the authority to make them. If participants can agree on who will make the ultimate decision that solves the problem, they are much more likely to support the solution. Decisionmakers will probably be both internal and external, and they will vary with the actions and participants involved. Communicate and confirm this preliminary identification with the decisionmakers. These decision points will be refined throughout the process. Make sure decisionmakers support the action or the process will die here. Keep managers informed and seek their advice on what resources are needed and how to proceed at key junctures. |
|||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
Please contact Deena Larsen 303-445-2584 with questions or comments on this material.